An argument for reporting data standardization procedures in multi-site predictive modeling: case study on the impact of LOINC standardization on model performance

Barda AJ, Ruiz VM, Gigliotti T, Tsui F. An argument for reporting data standardization procedures in multi-site predictive modeling: case study on the impact of LOINC standardization on model performance. JAMIA Open, 00), 2018, 1-8. doi: 10.1093/jamiaopen/ooy063

Objectives

We aimed to gain a better understanding of how standardization of laboratory data can impact predictive model performance in multi-site datasets. We hypothesized that standardizing local laboratory codes to logical observation identifiers names and codes (LOINC) would produce predictive models that significantly outperform those learned utilizing local laboratory codes.

Materials and Methods

We predicted 30-day hospital readmission for a set of heart failure-specific visits to 13 hospitals from 2008 to 2012. Laboratory test results were extracted and then manually cleaned and mapped to LOINC. We extracted features to summarize laboratory data for each patient and used a training dataset (2008–2011) to learn models using a variety of feature selection techniques and classifiers. We evaluated our hypothesis by comparing model performance on an independent test dataset (2012).

Results

Models that utilized LOINC performed significantly better than models that utilized local laboratory test codes, regardless of the feature selection technique and classifier approach used.

Discussion and Conclusion

We quantitatively demonstrated the positive impact of standardizing multi-site laboratory data to LOINC prior to use in predictive models. We used our findings to argue for the need for detailed reporting of data standardization procedures in predictive modeling, especially in studies leveraging multi-site datasets extracted from electronic health records.

Publication Year: 
2019
Publication Credits: 
Barda AJ, Ruiz VM, Gigliotti T, Tsui F
Publication Download: 
AttachmentSize
PDF icon anargument.pdf414.84 KB
^